An arrow landed on the pitch in Oval, England and the county cricket match was suspended. The metal-tipped arrow had been fired from outside the stadium and the police is yet to reach a conclusion on the motive. BBC reported this in the early morning news bulletin on BBC World News. Would the projectile have caused harm if it had hit a person on the ground? Similar incidents, stone/bottle been thrown onto the ground, in India and other countries have got little or no traction. Why, then did BBC give so much importance in a world service news programme? Flooding in Assam gets little coverage but Mumbai floods are on the front page of Indian newspapers. Flooding anywhere in India gets little to no coverage in CNN but hours are spent on the Houston flooding. Why is there such imbalance and parochialism in the news coverage by reputed news organizations? India doesn't matter on the world scene, Assam doesn't matter in the Indian context. Audience matters- so if the major portion...