Skip to main content

Filmy thoughts



What is the purpose of a film? Most probably it is to tell a story visually and entertain the audience, in the bargain. Does it have a social purpose? Of course, some may say that a film has to instruct and throw light on social reality in a bid to change society for the better. Is a film an expression of art? Film makers feel that film making is a creative field and it affords artistic possibilities. So, depending on the purpose behind a film, we can categorize films as commercial, middle cinema or art house production.
Film makers need adequate freedom in order to entertain, highlight the issues and impact the masses. External validation, especially at the box office, is not necessary for these film makers. They create pieces of art, aesthetically appealing for art’s sake. Patronage is very important and that is where the state comes into the picture. India has NFDC to support and fund the talented film makers who are interested in making socially relevant films. One film maker from the past who took advantage of the state patronage is Saeed Akhtar Mirza of the Salim Langade Pe Math Ro fame. His films always had social concerns highlighted, debated but no solutions provided.
Commercial cinema on the other hand has many consequences:
1.       Diluting the quality to cater to larger audiences.
2.       Stereotyping and sameness of story-line.
3.       More importance to star over character.
4.       Song and dance sequences unnecessarily added.
5.       Importance of visual effects over aesthetic value.
Take the craze over Bahubali, the latest version. One cannot put a finger on why people are going ga-ga over the film. Is it the special effects, story-telling ability of the film maker, larger than life drama, mythical characters with super-human abilities or just marketing hype? One thing is sure- it has already spawned a large number of similar projects, each having a budget more than Bahubali 2.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Principled Nitish

Nitish Kumar is called a political parasite by RJD spokesperson Nawal Kishore during a discussion on NDTV 24x7. Kishore's point was that Nitish does not have the grassroot support to win elections on his own and therefore piggybacks on other parties. In 2005, with the help of BJP, Nitish became the Chief Minister of Bihar for the first time. The alliance worked in the next elections in 2010. But just before the 2014 Parliamentary elections, Nitish broke from BJP on the issue of Narendra Modi being elevated as the party's choice of PM. Nitish stayed in power with the help of outside support from Congress and RJD. In the next Assembly elections held in 2015, the Mahagatbandhan swept Bihar with a two-thirds majority and Nitish was back as the Chief Minister for the third successive time.Finally, last week Nitish decided to break the alliance with RJD and Congress over corruption charges on Tejeshwi Yadav and re-align with BJP to remain CM. There are two principles on which Nitis...

Syncretic Culture

The Club of Hindi and Urdu Poets (CHUP) at Christ University, Bangalore organised the annual Sham-e-Gazal night on 25th February 2025 in the main auditorium, Central Campus. One by one, poets took the stage—some sang, others recited—bringing their verses to life. Urdu and Hindi, often unjustly viewed as symbols of religious division, intertwined effortlessly in the voices of the performers, creating a shared space of artistic expression. The words of Allama Iqbal came to mind:  "Kaahil baste rahe, Hindustan banta raha" (The idle kept settling, and Hindustan kept being built).  Poet Raghupati Sahay, popularly known to the world of poetry as Firaq Gorakhpuri imbibed the spirit of Hindustan. He was an English professor, who wrote mostly in Urdu and in Hindi. Throughout his life, he tried to dispel the notion that a language is linked to one religion but belongs to anyone who learnt and spoke the language. Yet, the legacy of Partition has fueled the mistaken belief that Urdu belo...

Israel-Palestinaian Conflict

 The media very extensively showed us the atrocities committed by Hamas on Israeli citizens inside Israel on 7 October 2023. The next few days the media and I mean mostly the Western media CNN and BBC in particular, had only the story from the Israeli side and justifibily so. This narrative of being the victim was then used by Israel to launch an air-based retaliation into Gaza. So far 10,500 people have died most of them civilians in the so-called targeted bombardment of Gaza by IDF. The Western countries that took very little time to come to the support and aid of Israel are slow in condemning and pressurising Israel to stop the killing of innocent civilians in Gaza. Israel has never differentiated between the militant Palestinians and civilians when it retaliates. We have history to recall- the massacre of innocent Palestinians in Lebanese refugee camps in the 1982 invasion of Lebanon by Israel. Israel was never brought to justice for the war crimes as the US vetoed any attempt ...